Confirmation and chaos

Philosophy of Science 69 (2):256-265 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, Rueger and Sharp (1996) and Koperski (1998) have been concerned to show that certain procedural accounts of model confirmation are compromised by non‐linear dynamics. We suggest that the issues raised are better approached by considering whether chaotic data analysis methods allow for reliable inference from data. We provide a framework and an example of this approach.

Author Profiles

Maralee Harrell
University of California, San Diego
Clark Glymour
Carnegie Mellon University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
404 (#71,068)

6 months
103 (#66,222)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?