How Essential are Essential Laws? A Thought Experiment on Physical Things and Their Givenness in Adumbrations

In Karl Mertens & Ingo Günzler (eds.), Wahrnehmen, Fühlen, Handeln. Phänomenologie im Widerstreit der Methoden. Mentis. pp. 421-436 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Husserl holds the view that givenness through adumbrations (i.e. perspectival givenness) is an essential characteristic of the givenness of spatiotemporal things. He goes so far to say that we are dealing with an essential law. In this article I try to make sense of this claim. I am also dealing with a thought experiment that is designed to show that the givenness through adumbrations is just a consequence of our physiological make-up, a view that Husserl explicitly rejects. Amongst other things, I defend Husserl by introducing the crucial distinction between first-person-imagination and third-person-imagination.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HARHEA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-12-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Thought Experiments: State of the Art.Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige & James R. Brown - 2018 - In Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach J. H. Fehige & James Robert Brown (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London, UK: Routledge. pp. 1-28.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-12-05

Total views
223 ( #19,650 of 50,141 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #30,777 of 50,141 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.