The Is-Ought Problem Stems From Morality as a Simplifying Framework

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I argue that David Hume's is-ought problem stems from morality as a simplifying framework. Morality is the attempt to describe human behaviour and its relation to nature through a court framework, dating to prehistoric times. Such a court does not really exist, hence we are not referring to anything directly when we make moral statements, and therefore 'is' and 'ought' do not align. The solution is to replace morality with what it's really trying to describe: patterns in individual behaviour.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HARTIP-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-10-31
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-10-31

Total views
78 ( #39,531 of 53,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #45,399 of 53,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.