Accounting for the Specious Present: A Defense of Enactivism

Journal of Mind and Behavior 39 (3):181-204 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that conscious visual experience is essentially a non-representational demonstration of a skill. The explication and defense of this position depends on both phenomenological and empirical considerations. The central phenomenological claim is this: as a matter of human psychology, it is impossible to produce a conscious visual experience of a mind-independent object that is sufficiently like typical cases, without including concomitant proprioceptive sensations of the sort of extra-neural behavior that allows us to there and then competently detect such objects. I then argue that this view, which is a version of enactivism, best explains the temporality of conscious experience—what is often called the specious present.

Author's Profile

Kaplan Hasanoglu
Emmanuel College

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-12

Downloads
283 (#54,316)

6 months
63 (#63,462)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?