Is the exclusion of psychiatric patients from access to physician-assisted suicide discriminatory?

Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (12):817-820 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Advocates of physician-assisted suicide often argue that, although the provision of PAS is morally permissible for persons with terminal, somatic illnesses, it is impermissible for patients suffering from psychiatric conditions. This claim is justified on the basis that psychiatric illnesses have certain morally relevant characteristics and/or implications that distinguish them from their somatic counterparts. In this paper, I address three arguments of this sort. First, that psychiatric conditions compromise a person’s decision-making capacity. Second, that we cannot have sufficient certainty that a person’s psychiatric condition is untreatable. Third, that the institutionalisation of PAS for mental illnesses presents morally unacceptable risks. I argue that, if we accept that PAS is permissible for patients with somatic conditions, then none of these three arguments are strong enough to demonstrate that the exclusion of psychiatric patients from access to PAS is justifiable.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HATITE-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-08-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Four Reasons Why Assisted Dying Should Not Be Offered for Depression.Blikshavn, Thomas; Husum, Tonje Lossius & Magelssen, Morten
'Unbearable Suffering': A Qualitative Study on the Perspectives of Patients Who Request Assistance in Dying.Dees, M. K.; Vernooij-Dassen, M. J.; Dekkers, W. J.; Vissers, K. C. & van Weel, C.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-08-29

Total views
126 ( #27,779 of 47,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
91 ( #6,687 of 47,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.