Spatial Perception and Geometry in Kant and Helmholtz

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper examines Helmholtz's attempt to use empirical psychology to refute certain of Kant's epistemological positions. Particularly, Helmholtz believed that his work in the psychology of visual perception showed Kant's doctrine of the a priori character of spatial intuition to be in error. Some of Helmholtz's arguments are effective, but this effectiveness derives from his arguments to show the possibility of obtaining evidence that the structure of physical space is non-Euclidean, and these arguments do not depend on his theory of vision. Helmholtz's general attempt to provide an empirical account of the "inferences" of perception is regarded as a failure.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-10-17
Latest version: 2 (2015-12-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft.Kant, Immanuel; Timmermann, Jens; Pluhar, Werner S.; Guyer, Paul & Wood, Allen W.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
245 ( #14,711 of 43,836 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #15,254 of 43,836 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.