Problems for Natural Selection as a Mechanism

Philosophy of Science 78 (3):512-523 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Skipper and Millstein analyze natural selection and mechanism, concluding that natural selection is not a mechanism in the sense of the new mechanistic philosophy. Barros disagrees and provides his own account of natural selection as a mechanism. This discussion identifies a missing piece of Barros's account, attempts to fill in that piece, and reconsiders the revised account. Two principal objections are developed: one, the account does not characterize natural selection; two, the account is not mechanistic. Extensive and persistent variability causes both of these difficulties, so further attempts to describe natural selection as a mechanism are also unlikely to succeed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-01-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Thinking About Mechanisms.Machamer, Peter K.; Darden, Lindley & Craver, Carl F.
Darwin's Dangerous Idea.Dennett, Daniel C.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Natural Kindness.Slater, Matthew
Natural Selection.Brandon, Robert

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
333 ( #13,492 of 50,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #27,641 of 50,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.