Consonances Between Liberalism and Pragmatism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper is an attempt to identify certain consonances between contemporary liberalism and classical pragmatism. I identify four of the most trenchant criticisms of classical liberalism presented by pragmatist figures such as James, Peirce, Dewey, Addams, and Hocking: that liberalism overemphasizes negative liberty, that it is overly individualistic, that its pluralism is suspect, that it is overly abstract. I then argue that these deficits of liberalism in its historical incarnations are being addressed by contemporary liberals. Contemporary liberals, I show, have taken on board a surprising number of classical pragmatist insights and have responded to a surprising number of classical pragmatist criticisms. I thus argue that both contemporary pragmatism and contemporary liberalism have much to gain by joining forces.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HAYCBL-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-09-23
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-09-12

Total views
440 ( #9,937 of 51,656 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #34,385 of 51,656 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.