Consonances Between Liberalism and Pragmatism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper is an attempt to identify certain consonances between contemporary liberalism and classical pragmatism. I identify four of the most trenchant criticisms of classical liberalism presented by pragmatist figures such as James, Peirce, Dewey, Addams, and Hocking: that liberalism overemphasizes negative liberty, that it is overly individualistic, that its pluralism is suspect, that it is overly abstract. I then argue that these deficits of liberalism in its historical incarnations are being addressed by contemporary liberals. Contemporary liberals, I show, have taken on board a surprising number of classical pragmatist insights and have responded to a surprising number of classical pragmatist criticisms. I thus argue that both contemporary pragmatism and contemporary liberalism have much to gain by joining forces.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-09-23
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
526 ( #11,483 of 2,448,336 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #20,698 of 2,448,336 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.