Reply to Adams and Clarke

Logos and Episteme 7 (2):221-225 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Here I defend two counterexamples to Nozick’s truth-tracking theory of knowledge from an attack on them by Adams and Clarke. With respect to the first counterexample, Adams and Clarke make the error of judging that my belief counts as knowledge. More demonstrably, with respect to the second counterexample they make the error of thinking that, on Nozick’s method-relativized theory, the method M in question in any given case must be generally reliable.
Categories
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HAZRTA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-01-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mad, Bad and Dangerous to Know.Briggs, Rachael & Nolan, Daniel

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Rejoinder to Haze.Adams, Fred & Clarke, Murray

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-07-08

Total views
53 ( #37,624 of 45,520 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,792 of 45,520 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.