Do demonstratives have senses?

Philosophers' Imprint 2:1-33 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Frege held that referring expressions in general, and demonstratives and indexicals in particular, contribute more than just their reference to what is expressed by utterances of sentences containing them. Heck first attempts to get clear about what the essence of the Fregean view is, arguing that it rests upon a certain conception of linguistic communication that is ultimately indefensible. On the other hand, however, he argues that understanding a demonstrative (or indexical) utterance requires one to think of the object denoted in an appropriate way. This fact makes it difficult to reconcile the view that referring expressions are "directly referential" with any view that seeks (as Grice's does) to ground meaning in facts about communication
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HECDDH
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-05-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
418 ( #15,841 of 64,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #16,805 of 64,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.