Is Compositionality a Trivial Principle?

Frontiers of Philosophy in China 8 (1):140-55 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Primarily a response to Paul Horwich's "Composition of Meanings", the paper attempts to refute his claim that compositionality—roughly, the idea that the meaning of a sentence is determined by the meanings of its parts and how they are there combined—imposes no substantial constraints on semantic theory or on our conception of the meanings of words or sentences. Show Abstract
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-06-13
Latest version: 2 (2020-05-01)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
460 ( #14,732 of 2,462,873 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #27,861 of 2,462,873 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.