The Composition of Thoughts

Noûs 45 (1):126-166 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Are Fregean thoughts compositionally complex and composed of senses? We argue that, in Begriffsschrift, Frege took 'conceptual contents' to be unstructured, but that he quickly moved away from this position, holding just two years later that conceptual contents divide of themselves into 'function' and 'argument'. This second position is shown to be unstable, however, by Frege's famous substitution puzzle. For Frege, the crucial question the puzzle raises is why "The Morning Star is a planet" and "The Evening Star is a planet" have different contents, but his second position predicts that they should have the same content. Frege's response to this antinomy is of course to distinguish sense from reference, but what has not previously been noticed is that this response also requires thoughts to be compositionally complex, composed of senses. That, however, raises the question just how thoughts are composed from senses. We reconstruct a Fregean answer, one that turns on an insistence that this question must be understood as semantic rather than metaphysical. It is not a question about the intrinsic nature of residents of the third realm but a question about how thoughts are expressed by sentences.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HECTCO-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-06-13
Latest version: 2 (2020-05-01)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.

View all 84 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-08-21

Total views
742 ( #4,689 of 50,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #41,999 of 50,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.