Epistemic Diversity and Editor Decisions: A Statistical Matthew Effect

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper offers a new angle on the common idea that the process of science does not support epistemic diversity. Under minimal assumptions on the nature of journal editing, we prove that editorial procedures, even when impartial in themselves, disadvantage less prominent research programs. This purely statistical bias in article selection further skews existing differences in the success rate and hence attractiveness of research programs, and exacerbates the reputation difference between the programs. After a discussion of the modeling assumptions, the paper ends with a number of recommendations that may help promote scientific diversity through editorial decision making.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HEEEDA
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-09-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-08-18

Total views
130 ( #41,677 of 65,596 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #50,115 of 65,596 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.