Is Peer Review a Good Idea?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Prepublication peer review should be abolished. We consider the effects that such a change will have on the social structure of science, paying particular attention to the changed incentive structure and the likely effects on the behaviour of individual scientists. We evaluate these changes from the perspective of epistemic consequentialism. We find that where the effects of abolishing prepublication peer review can be evaluated with a reasonable level of confidence based on presently available evidence, they are either positive or neutral. We conclude that on present evidence abolishing peer review weakly dominates the status quo.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HEEIPR
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-05-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-09-20

Total views
219 ( #20,516 of 51,730 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #11,031 of 51,730 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.