Modus Darwin Reconsidered

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
ABSTRACT ‘Modus Darwin’ is the name given by Elliott Sober to a form of argument that he attributes to Darwin in the Origin of Species, and to subsequent evolutionary biologists who have reasoned in the same way. In short, the argument form goes: similarity, ergo common ancestry. In this article, I review and critique Sober’s analysis of Darwin’s reasoning. I argue that modus Darwin has serious limitations that make the argument form unsuitable for supporting Darwin’s conclusions, and that Darwin did not reason in this way.
Reprint years
2016, 2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-09-28
Latest version: 2 (2019-09-25)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
508 ( #10,341 of 58,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #49,692 of 58,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.