The Confirmational Significance of Agreeing Measurements

Philosophy of Science 80 (5):721-732 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Agreement between "independent" measurements of a theoretically posited quantity is intuitively compelling evidence that a theory is, loosely speaking, on the right track. But exactly what conclusion is warranted by such agreement? I propose a new account of the phenomenon's epistemic significance within the framework of Bayesian epistemology. I contrast my proposal with the standard Bayesian treatment, which lumps the phenomenon under the heading of "evidential diversity".
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-05-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Modus Darwin.Sober, Elliott

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
110 ( #22,778 of 40,033 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #20,827 of 40,033 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.