Response to Wunder: objective probability, non-contingent theism, and the EAAN

Religious Studies:1-5 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper is a response to Tyler Wunder’s ‘The modality of theism and probabilistic natural theology: a tension in Alvin Plantinga's philosophy’ (this journal). In his article, Wunder argues that if the proponent of the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN) holds theism to be non-contingent and frames the argument in terms of objective probability, that the EAAN is either unsound or theism is necessarily false. I argue that a modest revision of the EAAN renders Wunder’s objection irrelevant, and that this revision actually widens the scope of the argument.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HENRTW-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-05-07

Total views
41 ( #30,471 of 38,069 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #25,507 of 38,069 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.