The Conflict of Interpretations as an Essential Epistemological Tool for Women’s Studies

Critical Hermeneutics 3:109-134 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper aims to show how Paul Ricoeur's hermeneutics, namely in the specificity of the Conflict of interpretations category, is a fruitful resource in the constitution of Women's Studies as well as to legitimize the need for its full integration in the canons of humanistic knowledge. In general, they continue to ignore the immense body of knowledge and perspectives that Women's Studies have produced in recent decades. In this sense, it begins by presenting the general features of the hermeneutic problematic and the theme of Conflict of Interpretations, and then showing its proven contribution to the development of Women's Studies and defending its possible contribution to enhancing their integration into canons.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-10-31
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
53 ( #55,376 of 64,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #27,677 of 64,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.