Unauthorized Pelvic Exams are Sexual Assault

The New Bioethics 28 (4):368-376 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The pelvic exam is used to assess the health of female reproductive organs and so involves digital penetration by a physician. However, it is common practice for medical students to acquire experience in administering pelvic exams by performing them on unconscious patients without prior authorization. In this article, we argue that such unauthorized pelvic exams (UPEs) are sexual assault. Our argument is simple: in any other circumstance, unauthorized digital penetration amounts to sexual assault. Since there are no morally significant differences between UPEs and other instances of digital penetration, UPEs are sexual assault. So, insofar as one is against sexual assault, one should be against UPEs.

Author Profiles

Perry Hendricks
Purdue University
Samantha Seybold
Purdue University

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-13

Downloads
685 (#30,624)

6 months
257 (#7,625)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?