Watered Down Essences and Elusive Speech Communities: Two Objections against Putnam's Twin Earth Argument

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper presents two objections against Putnam’s Twin Earth argument, which was intended to secure semantic externalism. I first claim that Putnam’s reasoning rests on two assumptions and then try to show why these assumptions are contentious. The first objection is that, given what we know about science, it is unlikely that there are any natural-kind terms whose extension is codetermined by a small set of microstructures required by Putnam’s indexical account of extension determination. The second objection is that there may not be a plausible concept of a speech community whose adoption would classify Oscar and Twin Oscar as members of different speech communities and, at the same time, render Oscar and Twin Oscar as being in the same psychological state. I contend that Putnam’s argument fails because both objections are justified.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HENWDE
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-02-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-02-19

Total views
72 ( #38,568 of 51,728 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #40,053 of 51,728 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.