Why the embryo rescue case is a bad argument against embryonic personhood

Bioethics 33 (6):669-673 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The “Embryo Rescue Case” (ERC) refers to a thought experiment that is used to argue against the view that embryos have a right to life (i.e. are persons). I will argue that cognitive science undermines the intuition elicited by the ERC; I will show that whether or not embryos have a right to life, our mental tools will make it very difficult to believe that embryos have said right. This suggests that the intuition elicited by the ERC is not truth indicative. The upshot of this is that we have an undercutting defeater for our intuition that embryos do not have a right to life.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HENWTE-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-05-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-01-23

Total views
240 ( #20,838 of 54,420 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #8,762 of 54,420 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.