Why the embryo rescue case is a bad argument against embryonic personhood

Bioethics 33 (6):669-673 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The “Embryo Rescue Case” (ERC) refers to a thought experiment that is used to argue against the view that embryos have a right to life (i.e. are persons). I will argue that cognitive science undermines the intuition elicited by the ERC; I will show that whether or not embryos have a right to life, our mental tools will make it very difficult to believe that embryos have said right. This suggests that the intuition elicited by the ERC is not truth indicative. The upshot of this is that we have an undercutting defeater for our intuition that embryos do not have a right to life.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HENWTE-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-05-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Schrödinger’s Fetus.Joona Räsänen - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (1):125-130.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-01-23

Total views
144 ( #25,575 of 47,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
75 ( #8,904 of 47,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.