Margaret Cavendish, Feminist Ethics, and the Problem of Evil

Religions 9 (4):1-13 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper argues that, although Margaret Cavendish’s main philosophical contributions are not in philosophy of religion, she makes a case for a defense of God, in spite of the worst sorts of harms being present in the world. Her arguments about those harms actually presage those of contemporary feminist ethicists, which positions Cavendish’s scholarship in a unique position: it makes a positive theodical contribution, by relying on evils that contemporary atheists think are the best evidence against the existence of God. To demonstrate that Cavendish’s work should be considered as early modern feminist theodicy, this paper will briefly introduce the contemporary feminist worry about theodicy as a project, show that Cavendish shares the contemporary feminist view about situated evil, and argue that her theodicy aims for agreement about how to eradicate great moral evils while preserving free will—and so, carves out a space for future female philosophers of religion who aim to be agents of healing in the face of such evil.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HERMCF
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-31
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Stump, Eleonore (ed.)

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-05-31

Total views
68 ( #31,430 of 42,912 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #15,184 of 42,912 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.