Carnap’s Theory of Descriptions and its Problems

Studia Logica 94 (3):355-380 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Carnap's theory of descriptions was restricted in two ways. First, the descriptive conditions had to be non-modal. Second, only primitive predicates or the identity predicate could be used to predicate something of the descriptum . The motivating reasons for these two restrictions that can be found in the literature will be critically discussed. Both restrictions can be relaxed, but Carnap's theory can still be blamed for not dealing adequately with improper descriptions.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HEYCTO
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-03-02
Latest version: 1 (2016-02-29)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Computability and Logic.Boolos, George; Burgess, John; P., Richard & Jeffrey, C.
A New Introduction to Modal Logic.Cresswell, M. J. & Hughes, G. E.
A New Introduction to Modal Logic.Crivelli, Paolo; Williamson, Timothy; Hughes, G. E. & Cresswell, M. J.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-03-31

Total views
440 ( #8,855 of 47,286 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #17,858 of 47,286 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.