Judging Quality and Coordination in Biomarker Diagnostic Development

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
What makes a high-quality biomarker experiment? The success of personalized medicine hinges on the answer to this question. In this paper, I argue that judgment about the quality of biomarker experiments is mediated by the problem of theoretical underdetermination. That is, the network of biological and pathophysiological theories motivating a biomarker experiment is sufficiently complicated that it often frustrates valid interpretation of the experimental results. Drawing on a case-study in biomarker diagnostic development from neurooncology, I argue that this problem of underdetermination can be overcome with greater coordination across the biomarker research trajectory. I then sketch an account for how coordination across a research trajectory can be evaluated. I ultimate conclude that what makes a high-quality biomarker experiment must be judged by the epistemic contribution it makes to this coordinated research effort.
ISBN(s)
0495-4548
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HEYJQA
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-06-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-06-26

Total views
494 ( #8,505 of 51,524 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #9,341 of 51,524 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.