Substantive Disagreement in the Le Monde Debate and Beyond: Replies to Duetz and Dentith, Basham, and Hewitt

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11):18-25 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I reply to criticisms from Duetz and Dentith, Basham, and Hewitt. I argue that the central disputes on this topic concern how ordinary people understand conspiracy theories and how to evaluate concrete conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.

Author's Profile

Scott Hill
Wichita State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-11

Downloads
229 (#78,093)

6 months
89 (#72,637)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?