Physical-object ontology, verbal disputes, and common sense

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):67–97 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two main claims are defended in this paper: first, that typical disputes in the literature about the ontology of physical objects are merely verbal; second, that the proper way to resolve these disputes is by appealing to common sense or ordinary language. A verbal dispute is characterized not in terms of private idiolects, but in terms of different linguistic communities representing different positions. If we imagine a community that makes Chisholm's mereological essentialist assertions, and another community that makes Lewis's four-dimensionalist assertions, the members of each community speak the truth in their respective languages. This follows from an application of the principle of interpretive charity to the two communities.

Author's Profile

Eli Hirsch
Brandeis University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
185 (#76,804)

6 months
934 (#1,121)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?