Responsible Brains: Neuroscience, Law, and Human Culpability

New York, NY, USA: MIT Press (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
[This download includes the table of contents and chapter 1.] When we praise, blame, punish, or reward people for their actions, we are holding them responsible for what they have done. Common sense tells us that what makes human beings responsible has to do with their minds and, in particular, the relationship between their minds and their actions. Yet the empirical connection is not necessarily obvious. The “guilty mind” is a core concept of criminal law, but if a defendant on trial for murder were found to have serious brain damage, which brain parts or processes would have to be damaged for him to be considered not responsible, or less responsible, for the crime? What mental illnesses would justify legal pleas of insanity? The authors argue that evidence from neuroscience and cognitive science can illuminate and inform the nature of responsibility and agency. They go on to offer a novel and comprehensive neuroscientific theory of human responsibility.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HIRRBN
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-09-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-09-13

Total views
403 ( #11,038 of 51,565 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
81 ( #6,048 of 51,565 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.