Responsible Brains: Neuroscience, Law, and Human Culpability

New York, NY, USA: MIT Press (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
[This download includes the table of contents and chapter 1.] When we praise, blame, punish, or reward people for their actions, we are holding them responsible for what they have done. Common sense tells us that what makes human beings responsible has to do with their minds and, in particular, the relationship between their minds and their actions. Yet the empirical connection is not necessarily obvious. The “guilty mind” is a core concept of criminal law, but if a defendant on trial for murder were found to have serious brain damage, which brain parts or processes would have to be damaged for him to be considered not responsible, or less responsible, for the crime? The authors argue that evidence from neuroscience and the other cognitive sciences can illuminate the nature of responsibility and agency. They go on to offer a novel and comprehensive neuroscientific theory of human responsibility.
Reprint years
0262038781   9780262038782
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-09-25
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
738 ( #8,922 of 70,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #11,551 of 70,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.