Self-deception and confabulation

Philosophy of Science 67 (3):S418-S429 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Cases in which people are self-deceived seem to require that the person hold two contradictory beliefs, something which appears to be impossible or implausible. A phenomenon seen in some brain-damaged patients known as confabulation (roughly, an ongoing tendency to make false utterances without intent to deceive) can shed light on the problem of self-deception. The conflict is not actually between two beliefs, but between two representations, a 'conceptual' one and an 'analog' one. In addition, confabulation yields valuable clues about the structure of normal human knowledge-gathering processes. [The hypothesis defended here is significantly altered and greatly expanded in my book Brain Fiction.]
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HIRSAC
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-04-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
618 ( #6,090 of 50,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #37,990 of 50,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.