Anti-Normativism Evaluated

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that recent attempts to show that meaning and content are not normative fail. The two most important arguments anti-normativists have presented are what I call the ‘argument from constitution’ and the ‘argument from guidance’. Both of these arguments suffer from the same basic problem: they overlook the possibility of focusing on assessability by norms, rather than compliance with norms or guidance by norms. Moreover, I argue that the anti-normativists arguments fail even if we ignore this basic problem. Thus, we have not been given good reasons to think that normativism is false
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-09-19
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
587 ( #11,891 of 69,074 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
85 ( #8,520 of 69,074 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.