Anti-Normativism Evaluated

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that recent attempts to show that meaning and content are not normative fail. The two most important arguments anti-normativists have presented are what I call the ‘argument from constitution’ and the ‘argument from guidance’. Both of these arguments suffer from the same basic problem: they overlook the possibility of focusing on assessability by norms, rather than compliance with norms or guidance by norms. Moreover, I argue that the anti-normativists arguments fail even if we ignore this basic problem. Thus, we have not been given good reasons to think that normativism is false
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against Content Normativity.Glüer, Kathrin & Wikforss, Åsa
How We Reason.Johnson-Laird, Philip

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
230 ( #14,071 of 41,618 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
72 ( #7,404 of 41,618 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.