In defense of the metaphysics of race

Philosophical Studies 174 (11):2709–2729 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper I defend the metaphysics of race as a valuable philosophical project against deflationism about race. The deflationists argue that metaphysical debate about the reality of race amounts to a non-substantive verbal dispute that diverts attention from ethical and practical issues to do with ‘race.’ In response, I show that the deflationists mischaracterize the field and fail to capture what most metaphysicians of race actually do in their work, which is almost always pluralist and very often normative and explicitly political. Even if debates about the reality of race turn out to be verbal disputes, they are substantive, and worth having.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-12-28
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-13)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Verbal Disputes.Chalmers, David J.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Race and Reference.Hochman, Adam
Social Meaning and the Unintended Consequences of Inclusion.Creary, Melissa; Thiel, Daniel & Eisen, Arri

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
535 ( #4,648 of 39,972 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
146 ( #2,527 of 39,972 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.