Is “Race” Modern? Disambiguating the Question

du Bois Review 1:1-19 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Race theorists have been unable to reach a consensus regarding the basic historical question, “is ‘race’ modern?” I argue that this is partly because the question itself is ambiguous. There is not really one question that race scholars are answering, but at least six. First, is the concept of race modern? Second, is there a modern concept of race that is distinct from earlier race concepts? Third, are “races” themselves modern? Fourth, are racialized groups modern? Fifth, are the means and methods associated with racialization modern? And sixth, are the meanings attached to racialized traits modern? Because these questions have different answers, the debate about the historical origins of “race” cannot be resolved unless they are distinguished. I will explain the ways in which “race” is and is not modern by answering these questions, thereby offering a resolution to a seemingly intractable problem.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOCIRM
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-02-09
Latest version: 2 (2020-02-09)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-09

Total views
259 ( #18,792 of 53,593 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
160 ( #2,740 of 53,593 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.