Racialization: A Defense of the Concept

Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (8):1245-1262 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper defends the concept of racialization against its critics. As the concept has become increasingly popular, questions about its meaning and value have been raised, and a backlash against its use has occurred. I argue that when “racialization” is properly understood, criticisms of the concept are unsuccessful. I defend a definition of racialization and identify its companion concept, “racialized group.” Racialization is often used as a synonym for “racial formation.” I argue that this is a mistake. Racial formation theory is committed to racial ontology, but racialization is best understood as the process through which racialized – rather than racial – groups are formed. “Racialization” plays a unique role in the conceptual landscape, and it is a key concept for race eliminativists and anti-realists about race.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOCRAD
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-12-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-12-10

Total views
807 ( #5,037 of 55,888 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
231 ( #1,894 of 55,888 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.