Race and Reference

Biology and Philosophy 34 (2):32 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The biological race debate is at an impasse. Issues surrounding hereditarianism aside, there is little empirical disagreement left between race naturalists and anti-realists about biological race. The disagreement is now primarily semantic. This would seem to uniquely qualify philosophers to contribute to the biological race debate. However, philosophers of race are reluctant to focus on semantics, largely because of their worries about the ‘flight to reference’. In this paper, I show how philosophers can contribute to the debate without taking the flight to reference. Drawing on the theory of reference literature and the history of meaning change in science, I develop some criteria for dealing with cases where there is uncertainty about reference. I then apply these criteria to the biological race debate. All of the criteria I develop for eliminating putative kinds are met in the case of ‘race’ as understood by twentieth century geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky and his contemporary proponents, suggesting that we should eliminate it from our biological ontology.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOCRAR-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-05-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style.Machery, Edouard; Mallon, Ron; Nichols, Shaun & Stich, Stephen
Against Arguments From Reference.Mallon, Ron; Machery, Edouard; Nichols, Shaun & Stich, Stephen
Verbal Disputes.Chalmers, David J.

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-04-06

Total views
31 ( #34,534 of 39,647 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #15,730 of 39,647 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.