Unnaturalised Racial Naturalism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Quayshawn Spencer (2014) misunderstands my treatment of racial naturalism. I argued that racial naturalism must entail a strong claim, such as “races are subspecies”, if it is to be a substantive position that contrasts with anti-realism about biological race. My recognition that not all race naturalists make such a strong claim is evident throughout the article Spencer reviews (Hochman, 2013a). Spencer seems to agree with me that there are no human subspecies, and he endorses a weaker form of racial naturalism. However, he supports his preferred version of ‘racial naturalism’ with arguments that are not well described as ‘naturalistic’. I argue that Spencer offers us an unnaturalised racial naturalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOCURN
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-07-15
Latest version: 2 (2016-01-22)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against the New Racial Naturalism.Adam Hochman - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (6):331–51.
Race: A Social Destruction of a Biological Concept.Neven Sesardic - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):143-162.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Race and Reference.Hochman, Adam

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-06-06

Total views
851 ( #2,094 of 39,026 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
197 ( #1,656 of 39,026 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.