'A succession of feelings, in and of itself, is not a feeling of succession'

Mind 122 (486):373-417 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Variants of the slogan that a succession of experiences does not amount to an experience of succession are commonplace in the philosophical literature on temporal experience. I distinguish three quite different arguments that might be captured using this slogan: the individuation argument, the unity argument, and the causal argument. Versions of the unity and the causal argument are often invoked in support of a particular view of the nature of temporal experience sometimes called intentionalism, and against a rival view sometimes called extensionalism. I examine these arguments in light of the individuation argument. In particular, I show that the individuation argument is, at least prima facie, neutral between those two views of temporal experience; and once the individuation argument is in place, the unity and causal argument also lose their force against extensionalism
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOEASO
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-05-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-09-16

Total views
359 ( #12,548 of 51,415 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #23,113 of 51,415 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.