Jaspers on explaining and understanding in psychiatry

In Thomas Fuchs & Giovanni Stanghellini (eds.), One Hundred Years of Karl Jaspers' General Psychopathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 107-120 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This chapter offers an interpretation of Jaspers’ distinction between explaining and understanding, which relates this distinction to that between general and singular causal claims. Put briefly, I suggest that when Jaspers talks about (mere) explanation, what he has in mind are general causal claims linking types of events. Understanding, by contrast, is concerned with singular causation in the psychological domain. Furthermore, I also suggest that Jaspers thinks that only understanding makes manifest what causation between one element of a person’s mental life and another ultimately consists in – that is, the particular way in which one psychic event can emerge from or arise out of another. I contrast the resulting view both with a view on causation in psychiatry recently put forward by John Campbell, and also with another view that is the target of Campbell’s attack, which is due to Donald Davidson and Daniel Dennett.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOEJOE
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-05-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-07-12

Total views
424 ( #7,831 of 43,704 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #5,012 of 43,704 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.