Lucky Achievement: Virtue Epistemology on the Value of Knowledge

Ratio 31 (3):303-311 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Virtue epistemology argues that knowledge is more valuable than Gettierized belief because knowledge is an achievement, but Gettierized belief is not. The key premise in the achievement argument is that achievement is apt (successful because competent) and Gettierized belief is inapt (successful because lucky). I first argue that the intuition behind the achievement argument is based wrongly on the fact that ‘being successful because lucky’ implicates ‘being not competent enough’. I then offer an argument from moral luck to argue that virtue epistemologists should maintain that knowledge is no more valuable than Gettierized belief.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-01-01
Latest version: 4 (2018-02-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Epistemic Luck.Pritchard, Duncan
Knowing Full Well.Sosa, Ernest

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
366 ( #11,722 of 49,043 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
85 ( #6,628 of 49,043 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.