The Limits of an Egalitarian Ethos: G. A. Cohen's Critique of Rawlsian Liberalism

Science and Society 75 (2):236 - 261 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
G.A. Cohen’s critique of the Rawlsian difference principle points out an inconsistency in its presentation. The initial equality decided by the participants in the original position under the veil of ignorance is not preserved by the inequality sanctioned by the difference principle. Cohen shows how the breakdown of the initial equality of the original position prevents the desired results of the Rawlsian system from being realized. Cohen argues that an egalitarian ethos is required within a society for equality preserving economic distributions and Pareto superior outcomes to occur. Nonetheless, Cohen’s analysis of Rawls misses the ultimate cause of inequality, which is the dynamics of capital accumulation. An egalitarian ethos is only possible if there is a socialist mode of production to facilitate its development. Additionally, Cohen’s critique of Rawlsian constructivism through an argument for intuitionism does not address the natural-material existence of human beings. This existence must be considered for any advantageous social formation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOLTLO-20
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-01-19
Latest version: 1 (2018-01-19)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Leviathan.Hobbes, Thomas
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.Sandel, Michael; Macintyre, Alasdair; Barber, Benjamin & Taylor, Charles

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-09-30

Total views
127 ( #26,633 of 46,142 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #15,861 of 46,142 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.