Naturalism and the Space of Reasons in Mind and World

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper aims to show that many criticisms of McDowell’s naturalism of second nature are based on what I call ‘the orthodox interpretation’ of McDowell’s naturalism. The orthodox interpretation is, however, a misinterpretation, which results from the fact that the phrase ‘the space of reasons’ is used equivocally by McDowell in Mind and World. Failing to distinguish two senses of ‘the space of reasons’, I argue that the orthodox interpretation renders McDowell’s naturalism inconsistent with McDowell’s Hegelian thesis that the conceptual is unbounded. My interpretation saves McDowell from being inconsistent. However, the upshot of my interpretation is that what is really at work in McDowell’s diagnosis of the dualism between nature and reason is the Hegelian thesis, not the naturalism of second nature.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-12-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mind and World.McDowell, John
Mind and World.Price, Huw & McDowell, John
Responses.McDowell, John

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
338 ( #13,239 of 50,269 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #18,812 of 50,269 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.