The Spectator in the Picture

In Rob Van Gerwen (ed.), Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting. Art as Representation and Expression. Cambridge University Press. pp. 215-231 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper considers whether pictures ever implicitly represent internal spectators of the scenes they depict, and what theoretical construal to offer of their doing so. Richard Wollheim's discussion (Painting as an Art, ch.3) is taken as the most sophisticated attempt to answer these questions. I argue that Wollheim does not provide convincing argument for his claim that some pictures implicitly represent an internal spectator with whom the viewer of the picture is to imaginatively identify. instead, I defend a view on which the external spectator simply imagines herself interacting, psychologically and otherwise, with the depicted scene. I explore some of the consequences of the two positions for pictorial aesthetics, arguing that the view I favour is at least as competent as Wollheim's at accommodating those phenomena we have any reason to think hold.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOPTSI
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Sculptors, Architects, and Painters Conceive of Depicted Spaces Differently.Cialone, Claudia; Tenbrink, Thora & Spiers, Hugo J.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-07-27

Total downloads
345 ( #6,866 of 36,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #4,995 of 36,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.