The speaking image: visual communication and the nature of depiction

In Matthew Kieran (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Blackwell. pp. 135--159 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper summarises the main claims I have made in a series of publications on depiction. Having described six features of depiction that any account should explain, I sketch an account that does this. The account understands depiction in terms of the experience to which it gives rise, and construes that experience as one of resemblance. The property in respect of which resemblance is experienced was identified by Thomas Reid, in his account of ‘visible figure’. I defend the account against certain criticisms, and compare it to some of its main rivals, in particular the views offered by Goodman, Wollheim and Dominic Lopes.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-01-27
Latest version: 2 (2016-01-27)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Depiction, Pictorial Experience, and Vision Science.Robert Briscoe - 2016 - Philosophical Topics 44 (2):43-81.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
292 ( #15,072 of 49,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #19,417 of 49,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.