Consequentialism and the Agent’s Point of View

Ethics 132 (4):787-816 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I propose and defend a novel view called “de se consequentialism,” which is noteworthy for two reasons. First, it demonstrates—contra Doug Portmore, Mark Schroeder, Campbell Brown, and Michael Smith, among others—that agent-neutral consequentialism is consistent with agent-centered constraints. Second, it clarifies the nature of agent-centered constraints, thereby meriting attention from even dedicated nonconsequentialists. Scrutiny reveals that moral theories in general, whether consequentialist or not, incorporate constraints by assessing states in a first-personal guise. Consequently, de se consequentialism enacts constraints through the very same feature that nonconsequentialist theories do.

Author's Profile

Nathan Robert Howard
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-15

Downloads
911 (#16,680)

6 months
247 (#10,982)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?