Intensity and the Sublime: Paying Attention to Self and Environment in Nature Sports

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 13 (1):1-13 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper responds to Kevin Krein’s claim in that the particular value of nature sports over traditional ones is that they offer intensity of sport experience in dynamic interaction between an athlete and natural features. He denies that this intensity is derived from competitive conflict of individuals and denies that nature sport derives its value from internal conflict within the athlete who carries out the activity. This paper responds directly to Krein by analysing ‘intensity’ in sport in terms of the relationship between attention and reflection and the interaction between self and environment. I reply directly to Krein’s rejection of self-competition as based on a mischaracterisation of internal struggle and argue that the weighing of incompatible desires does not involve a fragmented self. I argue that the unique intensity to which Krein refers is strongly comparable to the Kantian conception of the sublime and explore how sublime experience fits Krein’s account and outline some serious problems that such an ideal of experience poses for nature sport.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-06-25
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
54 ( #54,074 of 2,448,362 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #51,685 of 2,448,362 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.