On Whitcomb's Grounding Argument for Atheism

Faith and Philosophy 30 (2):198-204 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Dennis Whitcomb argues that there is no God on the grounds that God is supposed to be omniscient, yet nothing could be omniscient due to the nature of grounding. We give a formally identical argument that concludes that one of the present co-authors does not exist. Since he does exist, Whitcomb’s argument is unsound. But why is it unsound? That is a difficult question. We venture two answers. First, one of the grounding principles that the argument relies on is false. Second, the argument equivocates between two kinds of grounding: instance-grounding and quasi-mereological grounding. Happily, the equivocation can be avoided; unhappily, avoidance comes at the price of a false premise.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-03-06
Latest version: 2 (2019-05-20)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
742 ( #7,265 of 2,448,711 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #12,141 of 2,448,711 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.