Theism, the Hypothesis of Indifference, and the Biological Role of Pain and Pleasure

Faith and Philosophy 11 (3):452-466 (1994)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Following Hume’s lead, Paul Draper argues that, given the biological role played by both pain and pleasure in goal-directed organic systems, the observed facts about pain and pleasure in the world are antecedently much more likely on the Hypothesis of Indifference than on theism. I examine one by one Draper’s arguments for this claim and show how they miss the mark.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-03-19
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
321 ( #20,167 of 2,448,750 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #38,132 of 2,448,750 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.