Ceteris Paribus Laws in Physics

Erkenntnis 79 (S10):1715-1728 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Earman and Roberts claim that there is neither a persuasive account of the truth-conditions of ceteris paribus laws, nor of how such laws can be confirmed or disconfirmed. I will give an account of the truth conditions of ceteris paribus laws in physics in terms of dispositions. It will meet the objections standardly raised against such an account. Furthermore I will elucidate how ceteris paribus laws can be tested in physics. The essential point is that physics provides methodologies for dealing with disturbing factors. For this reason disturbing factors need not be listed explicitly in law-statements. In virtue of the methodologies it is possible to test how systems would behave if the disturbing factors were absent. I will argue that this suffices to establish the tenability of the dispositional account of ceteris paribus laws
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-06-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Powers.Molnar, George
Dispositions.Choi, Shungho & Fara, Michael
Ceteris Paribus Post.Earman, John; Roberts, John T. & Smith, Sheldon

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Understanding (with) Toy Models.Reutlinger, Alexander; Hangleiter, Dominik & Hartmann, Stephan
Understanding (With) Toy Models.Reutlinger, Alexander; Hangleiter, Dominik & Hartmann, Stephan
Ceteris Paribus Laws.Reutlinger, Alexander; Schurz, Gerhard; Hüttemann, Andreas & Jaag, Siegfried

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
351 ( #12,694 of 50,438 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #22,574 of 50,438 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.