Scientific Practice and Necessary Connections

Theoria 79 (1):29-39 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I will introduce a problem for at least those Humeans who believe that the future is open.More particularly, I will argue that the following aspect of scientific practice cannot be explained by openfuture- Humeanism: There is a distinction between states that we cannot bring about (which are represented in scientific models as nomologically impossible) and states that we merely happen not to bring about. Open-future-Humeanism has no convincing account of this distinction. Therefore it fails to explain why we cannot bring about certain states of affairs, it cannot explain what I call the “recalcitrance of nature”.
Reprint years
2013, 2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HTTSPA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-02-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
What is a Law of Nature?Armstrong, David M.
Counterfactuals.Lewis, David

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-02-27

Total views
318 ( #14,119 of 50,327 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,576 of 50,327 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.