Irrational desires

Philosophical Studies 62 (1):23 - 44 (1991)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Many believe that the rational evaluation of actions depends on the rational evaluation of even basic desires. Hume, though, viewed desires as "original existences" which cannot be contrary to either truth or reason. Contemporary critics of Hume, including Norman, Brandt and Parfit, have sought a basis for the rational evaluation of desires that would deny some basic desires reason-giving force. I side with Hume against these modern critics. Hume's concept of rational evaluation is admittedly too narrow; even basic desires are, despite their nonrepresentational nature, subject to rational evaluation. But this evaluation is not relevant to their tendency to generate reasons for action, and does not undermine the spirit of the Humean view of rational action.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-05-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Reasons for Actions.Norman, Richard

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
2,062 ( #999 of 50,367 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
438 ( #661 of 50,367 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.