Milne’s Argument for the Log‐Ratio Measure

Philosophy of Science 75 (4):413-420 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article shows that a slight variation of the argument in Milne 1996 yields the log‐likelihood ratio l rather than the log‐ratio measure r as “the one true measure of confirmation. ” *Received December 2006; revised December 2007. †To contact the author, please write to: Formal Epistemology Research Group, Zukunftskolleg and Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz, P.O. Box X906, 78457 Konstanz, Germany; e‐mail: franz.huber@uni‐
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-07-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bayesian Confirmation: A Means with No End.Brössel, Peter & Huber, Franz

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
172 ( #23,666 of 49,074 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #38,282 of 49,074 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.