The Logic of Confirmation

In O. Neumaier, C. Sedmak & M. Zichy (eds.), Philosophische Perspektiven. Beiträge zum VII. Internationalen Kongress der ÖGP. Ontos (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper presents a new analysis of Hempel’s conditions of adequacy, differing from the one in Carnap. Hempel, so it is argued, felt the need for two concepts of confirmation: one aiming at true theories, and another aiming at informative theories. However, so the analysis continues, he also realized that these two concepts were conflicting, and so he gave up the concept of confirmation aiming at informative theories. It is then shown that one can have the cake and eat it: There is a logic of confirmation that accounts for both of these two conflicting aspects.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HUBTLO-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-07-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-07-24

Total views
165 ( #19,510 of 42,917 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #29,921 of 42,917 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.